Some people think pollution and damage of environment are resulted from a country developing and becoming richer, and this is hard to be avoided. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
雅思大作文解題思路:
1. 不可否認的是,工業(yè)化是任何一個國家經濟起飛的必經之路,這就會帶來污染。舉例,為了追求GDP,中國這個發(fā)展中國家不得不大力發(fā)展制造業(yè),成為全球工廠,而這帶來的是大量的煤塵和化學廢料被從工廠中排放到空氣,水體和土壤中。
2. 此外,當人們財富增多的時候,他們的消費就會增多,舉例,使用汽車,冰箱,空調。而這些都是造成氣候變暖的主因。
3. 然而,我始終認為人們對于生活習慣的改變能緩解一部分的環(huán)境問題。舉例,騎車或是步行去上下班,放棄開車。還有,使用可重復使用的杯子和餐具,而不是一次性物品。最后,積極地進行垃圾分類。
雅思大作文高分范文:
Does the economic development come with the environmental pollution, as the speakerasserts? This question has been a heated social issue in debate. In my view,industry is the pre-condition of a thriving economy, so that industrial pollution is inescapable, and my reasons would be explored as below.
Undeniably,there is a universally regular pattern of economy growth that in all countries,the economy rising is always at the expense of environment, and which no onecan be exempt from. First, in retrospect of human history, industrialization,an essential stage in midst of economy development, are an unavoidable sourceof environmental pollution. For example, in order to keep a rapid growth ofGDP, Chinese manufacturing industry receives all kinds of product ordersworldwide, from iPhones to sports shoes to Barbie dolls. In the process ofproduction, an excessive number of smog, chemical wastes and toxic heavy metalsare discharged into air, water and soil, thus contaminating the environment inan overall way.
In addition, an increase in social wealth boosts the goods consumption, which further deterio rates the enviomental destruction. In China, again, soaring average salaries among the public make private cars and appliances like fridges, air conditioners and microwave ovens affordable now. However, these modern facilities are main carbon emitters, and whose wise use would contribute to the global warming inevitably.
Although the complete prevention of pollution is a fantasy, I still believe our effortsto change lifestyle in daily life can partially reduce the level ofenvironmental pollution. For example, if urbanites can use walking or cycling,rather than private cars, for day-to-day commuting outside, then the gasemission would decline steeply. Similarly, if the public can consciously obeythe principle or 3R--reducing the consumption of one off goods, reusingrefillable bottles and containers, and recycling those renewable materials likeplastics, paper and metals, then the amount of industrial and daily-lifepollutants will be lowered quickly.
In conclusion, as long as the economy and the wealth of ordinary people aregrowing, the environmental pollution would exist for a long time. However, wecan still our efforts to reduce the pollution level, by living a green andclean life.(359 words)