2020年?yáng)|京奧運(yùn)會(huì)或涉賄選丑聞

The Guardian alleges a payment of about 1mpounds was paid into the account during the race tohost the 2020 Games.

近日英國(guó)《衛(wèi)報(bào)》聲稱(chēng)，在2020年奧運(yùn)會(huì)主辦地申辦的投票過(guò)程中，曾有一筆100萬(wàn)英鎊的賄金打入了某賬戶(hù)當(dāng)中。

In March, French prosecutors investigatingcorruption in athletics widened their scope toinclude the bidding and voting processes for thehosting of the 2016 and 2020 Olympics. The Britishnewspaper says French police are believed to bestudying the allegation.

在今年3月份，法國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)將其針對(duì)田徑領(lǐng)域腐敗現(xiàn)象調(diào)查的范圍擴(kuò)大到了2016年和2020年奧運(yùn)會(huì)主辦國(guó)的競(jìng)標(biāo)和投票階段。據(jù)《衛(wèi)報(bào)》表示，法國(guó)警察正在對(duì)此進(jìn)行調(diào)查。

In a statement, the IOC said it had been "in contact with the French magistrates in charge ofthe investigation on the IAAF case, and with Wada, since its start".

國(guó)際奧委會(huì)在一份聲明中表示，該機(jī)構(gòu)從最一開(kāi)始便同調(diào)查國(guó)際田徑聯(lián)合會(huì)案件的法國(guó)司法機(jī)關(guān)以及世界反興奮劑組織保持著聯(lián)系。

It added: "The IOC's chief ethics and compliance officer will continue to be in contact with allinterested parties to clarify any alleged improper conduct. The IOC will not comment anyfurther on the elements of the investigations at this stage."

該聲明補(bǔ)充說(shuō)道：“國(guó)際奧委會(huì)負(fù)責(zé)道德和行為準(zhǔn)則的官員將繼續(xù)同相關(guān)團(tuán)體保持聯(lián)系，以查清任何可能涉嫌的不當(dāng)行為。在當(dāng)前階段，國(guó)際奧委會(huì)將不會(huì)進(jìn)行更多的評(píng)論。”

A first alleged payment in July 2013 and a second one three months later were made underthe title of "Tokyo 2020 Olympic Game Bid" from a Japanese bank account to a Singaporeaccount held by Black Tidings, the French financial prosecutor's office said in a statement.Black Tidings is reported to have links to Papa Massata Diack, son of Lamine Diack.

法國(guó)金融檢察官辦公室在一份聲明中表示，第一筆涉案款項(xiàng)在2013年7月支付，第二筆在三個(gè)月后支付，其匯款事由一欄都寫(xiě)著“東京2020年奧運(yùn)會(huì)申辦”，它們都從一個(gè)日本的銀行賬戶(hù)匯至Black Tidings公司在新加坡持有的一個(gè)賬戶(hù)。Black Tidings公司據(jù)報(bào)道與迪亞克的兒子帕帕·馬薩塔·迪亞克有關(guān)聯(lián)。

Wada's independent commission said it did not investigate the claims "for it was not withinour remit".

不過(guò)，世界反興奮劑組織獨(dú)立委員會(huì)表示，并未對(duì)此進(jìn)行調(diào)查，“因?yàn)檫@項(xiàng)調(diào)查不屬于其職權(quán)范圍”。