政府的財政是否應投資于理財教育Whether the government should invest in financial education

Knowledge is power,Francis bacon wrote long ago. Education has a keyto play in one’s growth and a nation’s development. Education is the driving force of productivity. Keeping this in mind, numerous countries and governmentsare paying closer attention to the cultivation of talents. Peoplediffer greatly in their views as to how to wisely allocateeducational budget, some people assert that instead of supportingother subjects, national investment in science is desirable. As Isee it, government should place equal stress on both science andarts. Granted, plenty ofevidence and arguments could be easily found to prove that it isadvisable for a nation to subsidize science. For a start, thecompetition among different countries, to some extent, amounts tothe competition of gifted people. Science and technology is thestimulating factor of the development of productivity. Largeamounts of talents could inject new life into a nation’sprosperity. Besides, in comparison with art students, those who arebetter equipped with science knowledge such as computer, businessand accounting could create more commercial value. Nevertheless, it israther superficial to simply say that national budget should beonly restricted to science investment. The mightiness of a nationinvolves many aspects and the cultivation of good citizens ortalents is to realize one’s comprehensive development. Theconstruction of a country needs enterprisers, mathematicians andscientist, yet, on no account can we ignore the immense value ofartists, writers, musicians. In addition to science subjects,literature, history, philosophy, music, art and PE should alsobecome the aim of education. Literature strengthens one’s culturaldeposit, history deepens one’s insight into life, philosophyfosters one’s analytical thinking, music moulds one’s temperament,art cultivates one’s artistic eye and PE enhances one’s healthindex. In these senses, art still deserves enough attachment andsupport. Art talents are indispensable to the betterment of acountry. Overall, Ire-affirm my conviction that education should not have too muchutilitarian, conversely, it needs to render more concerns overone’s spiritual growth and character-training. Ideal educationalpolicy should place equal significance on science investment andother subjects

知識就是力量，弗蘭西斯。教育的關鍵在一個人的成長和國家的發(fā)展起到。教育是生產(chǎn)力的驅(qū)動力。為此，很多國家政府高度重視對人才的培養(yǎng)。人在自己的意見如何明智的教育預算差異很大，一些人斷言，而不是支持學科科學家，國家投資是可取的。在我看來，政府應該并重、科學與藝術。當然，很多證據(jù)和論據(jù)可以輕易的發(fā)現(xiàn)證明，最好一個國家資助科學。一開始，各國之間的競爭，在一定程度上，導致競爭的有天賦的人?？茖W技術是生產(chǎn)力發(fā)展的激勵因素。大量的人才可以成為一個國家興旺發(fā)達的不竭注入新的生命。此外，在藝術的學生相比，那些均配備科學知識，如計算機，商業(yè)會計可以創(chuàng)造更多的商業(yè)價值。然而，這很簡單地說，國家預算應只限于科學投資表。一個nationinvolves許多方面的強大和良好的公民ortalents栽培是實現(xiàn)人的全面發(fā)展。國家建設需要企業(yè)家，數(shù)學家、科學家，但是，絕不能忽視的巨大價值的藝術家，作家，音樂家。除了科學，文學，歷史，哲學，音樂，美術和體育也應該成為教育的目標。文學可以增強人的culturaldeposit加深，歷史的洞察生活，培養(yǎng)人的辯證思維，音樂陶冶人的情操，藝術培養(yǎng)人的藝術眼光和體育提高人的健康指數(shù)。在這些意義上，藝術仍然值得足夠的附件支持。藝術人才是一個國家發(fā)展不可或缺的?？偟膩碚f，我堅信憤怒肯定教育不應該有太muchutili質(zhì)疑，相反，它需要給予更多的關注超過的精神成長和性格的培養(yǎng)。理想的教育政策應該平等意義上的科學投資等科目。