大學英語綜合教程第二冊 8

[00:00.00] Protecting nature certainly has benefits, but it has costs as well [00:05.80]How are we to balance the two when deciding how far we should go in caring for the environment? [00:13.79]SAVING NATURE, BUT ONLY FOR MAN by Charles Krauthammer [00:20.98]Environmental sensitivity is now as required an attitude in polite society as is, say, [00:30.17]belief in democracy or aversion to nylon. But now that everyone has claims to love Mother Earth, [00:39.26]how are we to choose among the dozens of conflicting proposals, restrictions, projects, [00:47.20]regulations and laws advanced in the name of the environment? [00:54.07]Clearly not everything with an environmental claim is worth doing. How to choose? [01:01.78]There is a simple way. First, distinguish between environmental luxu ries and env'n'onmental necessities. [01:11.50]Luxuries are those things it would be nice to have if costless.Necessities are those things we must have regardless. [01:23.02]Then apply a rule. Call it the fundamental principle of sensible environmentalism: Combating ecological change [01:34.17]that directly threatens the health and safety of people is an environmental necessity. All else is luxury. [01:44.49]For example: preserving the atmosphere, by both protecting the ozone layer and halting the greenhouse effect, [01:53.87]is an environmental necessity. In April scientists reported that ozone damage [02:03.01]is far worse than previously thought. Ozone reduction not only causes skin cancer and eye cataracts, [02:13.54]it also destroys plankton, the beginning of the food chain on top of which we humanssit. [02:21.82]The reality of the greenhouse effect is more speculative, though its possible consequences are far deadlier: [02:31.43]melting ice caps, flooded coastlines, disturbed climate, dried up plains and, ullLrnately, empty breadbaskets. [02:42.56]The American Midwest feeds the world. [02:47.34]Are we prepared to see Iowa acquire Albuquerque's climate? And Siberia acquire Iowa's? [02:56.48]Ozone reduction and the greenhouse effect are human disasters. They happen to occur in the environment. [03:06.38]But they are urgent because they direedy threaten man. A sensible environmentalism, [03:15.21]the only kind of environ- mentalism that will win universal public support, [03:21.77]begins by unashamedly declaring that nature is here to serve man.A sensible environmentalism is entirely man-centered: [03:33.94]it calls for man to preserve nature, but on the grounds of self-preservation. [03:41.47]A sensible environmentalism does not sentimentalize the earth. [03:47.92]It does not ask people to sacrifice in the name of other creatures. After all, [03:56.09]it is hard enough to ask people to sacrifice in the name of other humans. [04:03.04]Think of the public resistance to foreign aid and welfare.Ask hardworking voters to sacrifice in the name of the snail dartei; [04:14.54]and, if they are feeling polite, they will give you a shrug. [04:20.68]Of course, this man-centeredness runs against the grain ofa contemporary environmentalism [04:28.62]that worships the earth to the point of excess. [04:33.82]One scientific theory Gaiatheory actually claims that Earthis allying organism. [04:42.85]This kind of environmentalism likes to consider itself spiritual. It is nothing more than sentimental. [04:52.05]It takes, for example, a highly selective view of the kindliness of nature. [04:59.70]My nature worship stops with the May storms that killed more than 125,000 Bengalis and left 10 million homeless. [05:11.01]A non-sentimental environmentalism is one founded on Protagoras' principle that "Man is the measure of all things." [05:20.63]Such a principle helps us to fight our way through the jungle of environmental argument. [05:27.99]Take the current debate raging over oil drilling in a corner of the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. [05:36.64]Environmentalists, fighting against a bill working its way through Congress to permit such exploration, [05:45.68]argue that we should be con i serving energy instead of drilling for it. This is a false either/or proposition. [05:55.16]The country does need a substantial energy tax to reduce consumption. But it needs more production too. [06:04.59]Government estimates indicate a nearly fify-fifty chance [06:11.15]that under the ANWR lies one of the five largest oil fields ever discovered in America. [06:19.95]We have just come through a war2 fought in part over oil: [06:25.83]Energy dependence costs Americans not just dollars but lives. It is a ridiculous sentimentalism that [06:35.89]would deny ourselves oil that is peacefullyattalnable because it risks disrupting the breeding grounds of Arctic reindeer. [06:46.02]I like the reindeer as much as the next man. And I would be rather sorry if their mating patterns are disturbed. [06:54.56]But you can't have everything.And if the choice is between the welfare of reindeer [07:01.90]and reducing oil dependence that gets people killed in wars, I choose man over reindeer every time. [07:10.50]Similarly the spotted owl. I am no enemy of the owl. If it could be preserved at no or little cost, [07:20.71]I would agree: the variety of nature is a good, ahigh aesthetic good. But it is no more than that. [07:30.48]And sometimes aesthetic goods have to be sacrificed to the more fundamental ones. [07:38.76]If the cost of preserving the spotted owl is the loss of livelihood for 30,000 logging fami- lies, [07:47.96]I choose family over owl. [07:52.08]The important distinction is between those environmental goods [07:58.33]that are fundamental and those that are merely aesthetic. Nature is our charge. It is not our master. [08:07.76]It is to be respected and even cultivated. But it is man's world. [08:14.84]And when man has to choose between his well-being and that of nature, nature will have to accommodate. [08:23.43]Man should accommodate only when his fate and that of nature are bound up together. [08:30.62]The most urgent accommodation must be made when the very integrity of man's environment e.g., [08:39.73]atmospheric ozone-is threat-ened. When the threat to man is of a lesser order [08:47.62](say, the pollutants from coal- and oil-fired generators that cause death from disease but not fatal damage to the ecosystem), [08:58.41]a more moderate accommodation that balances economic against health concerns is in order. [09:05.80]But in either case the principle is the same: protect the environment--because it is man's environment. [09:14.97]The sentimental environmentalists will call this saving nature with a totally wrong flame of mind. [09:23.23]Exactly. A sensible-- a humanistic --environ- mentalism does it not for nature's sake but for our own. [09:34.07]Language Sence Enhancement [09:37.52]2 Read aloud the following poem [09:40.89]The Beauty of Nature James Teh [09:46.14]One cool evening,I put aside all duty,To sit alone, watching the sun set, [09:54.94]And as I do,I think of scenes filled with beauty,Scenes I wish to never forget. [10:02.46]I think of the beach,with the sand and the sea,The waves roaring up,then gently lapping the beach, [10:11.97]The cries of the seagulls1, so happy, so free,If only men realized the lesson it can teach. [10:21.82]I think of a lake, the crystal clear water,So pure, so smooth, and cool on my skin, [10:30.65]The air,so clean, no toxicz slaughter,There's a key,a lesson held within. [10:39.79]I think of a waterfall, water freely flowing, The gentle gush1, gurglingz in my ears, [10:48.70]The wind on my face, calmly blowing,So many have not learnt in so many years. [10:56.80]The sunset,the beach,the lake, the waterfall, They're things of nature, not man-made at all, [11:06.07]Characteristics unbeatable by man have they all,They're peace and beauty both of which it seems men want to fall. [11:17.85]3 Read the following quotations. Learn them by heart if you can. You might need to look up new words in a dictionary. [11:28.33]Complete adaptation to environment means death, [11:33.26]The essential point in all response is the desire to control environment. John Deweu [11:42.75]We won't have a society if we destroy the environment. Marqaret Mead [11:51.34]We make the world we live in and shape our own environment. Orison Swett Marden [12:00.17]When man is happy,he is in harmony with himself and his environment. Oscar Wilder [12:09.78]4 Read the following joke for fun: [12:15.01]How many environmentalists does it take to change a light bulb? [12:20.57]Ten. One to install the new bulb and nine to figure out what to do with

00:00

00:00

MP3下載 文本下載