In a world where sight and sound seem to reign supreme, all it takes is a cursory glance at the size of the perfume industry to realise that smell matters quite a lot, too. Odours are known to regulate moods, thoughts and even dating decisions, which is why any serious romantic will throw on the eau de toilette before going out for a night on the town. Yet in all these cases, those affected are aware of what they are smelling. Unlike the media of sight and sound, in which subliminal messages have been studied carefully, the potential power of subliminal smells has been neglected.
Wen Li and her colleagues at Northwestern University in Chicago are now changing that. In particular, they are investigating smells so faint that people say they cannot detect them. The idea is to see whether such smells can nevertheless change the way that people behave towards others.
Dr. Li's experiment, the results of which have just been published in Psychological Science, employed 31 volunteers. These people were exposed to three different odours at low concentration. One was the fresh lemon scent of citral. The second was the neutral ethereal perfume of anisole. The third was the foul sweaty smell of valeric acid. And the concentrations really were low. In the case of valeric acid, for example, that concentration was seven parts per trillion—a level only just detectable by bloodhounds. As a control, Dr. Li used a mineral oil that has no detectable smell at any concentration.
The participants were asked to sniff a jar containing either one of the three odours or the scentless oil, and then press a button to indicate whether they thought the jar smelled of anything. Immediately after that, a picture of a face would appear on a screen in front of them for just over a second. Each participant was asked to rate the face's “likeability”.
Dr. Li found that the odours helped shape people's judgments about the faces when their responses indicated that they had not smelled anything. When someone had been exposed to valeric acid, for example, he tended to react negatively to a face. Exposure to citral, by contrast, made that face seem, on average, more friendly. (Obviously, the same face was not shown to any given participant more than once.) Even more intriguing, however, was that when participants did consciously perceive a smell, its effect on face-perception disappeared.
What is going on is unclear. If smells can carry useful information about personality (which is possible), then the effect would be expected to be the same whether or not the chemical in question is detected subliminally. If they do not carry such information, then it is hard to see what use the subliminal reaction is. Nevertheless, it is there.
The findings do, however, demonstrate what might be a powerful method of manipulation. Indeed, Dr. Li considers the potential uses to be vast. Business meetings might be made more pleasant by releasing appropriate fragrances into the air in unsmellable amounts. Conversely, fights might be started by putting people in the presence of a faint foul odour. Advertising hoardings might benefit from a little olfactory tweaking and cinema audiences could be reduced to floods of tears at the appropriate moment. The sweet smell of success might, in other words, actually be undetectable.
1. Dr. Li is carrying out such an investigation in order to _____.
[A] find out how smells regulate moods in a subtle and nuanced way
[B] prove that smell plays an equally important role in daily life as that of sight and sound
[C] find out if people are sensitive to faint smells
[D] find out if faint smells could influence people's judgement of others
2. The mineral oil is used in Dr. Li's experiment to _____.
[A] control the concentration of odours in a slightly detectable degree
[B] act as a group of comparison with that of the other smells
[C] regulate the participants' moods by decreasing the smell's concentration
[D] protect the participants from losing sense of smell
3. The word “likeability” (Line 4, Paragraph 4) most probably means _____.
[A] similarity
[B] likeness
[C] loveliness
[D] likelihood
4. When the participants consciously smelt the valeric acid, they tended to _____.
[A] make negative judgement to a face
[B] make positive judgement to a face
[C] make biased judgement to a face
[D] make fair judgement to a face
5. From Dr. Li's experiment, it can be inferred that _____.
[A] one's reaction to subliminal smells reflect useful information about his or her personality
[B] subliminal smells can influence people's interaction with each other
[C] subliminal smells have no effect on people's conscious face-perception
[D] subliminal smells turn out to be a means of powerful manipulation in terms of business success
1. Dr. Li is carrying out such an investigation in order to _____.
[A] find out how smells regulate moods in a subtle and nuanced way
[B] prove that smell plays an equally important role in daily life as that of sight and sound
[C] find out if people are sensitive to faint smells
[D] find out if faint smells could influence people's judgement of others
1. 李博士進行這項試驗是為了 _____。
[A] 探索氣味是如何以一種細(xì)小微妙的方式左右人的情緒的
[B] 證明氣味在人們的生活中與視覺和聽覺一樣起著重要的作用
[C] 探索人們是否對微弱的氣味敏感
[D] 探索微弱的氣味是否可以影響人們對他人的判斷
答案:D 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:推理題。文章介紹了李博士的試驗,可以看出,該試驗的對象是微弱的、人們聞不到的氣味,主要是研究這種氣味能否影響人們對于他人的行為。從對試驗的詳細(xì)描述來看,主要是人們對于他人的印象和判斷。其中文章的第一段和第二段分別談到“與視覺和聲音媒介不同的是,它們其中微小的訊息已經(jīng)被仔細(xì)研究過了,而淡淡的氣味中隱藏的力量卻被人們忽略了”,“特別需要指出的是,他們現(xiàn)在研究的氣味都極其微弱,以至于人們都說他們聞不到這些氣味。他們想看看這些氣味是不是也可以影響人們對他人的行為”等都說明了選項D最為符合文章的意思。
2. The mineral oil is used in Dr. Li's experiment to _____.
[A] control the concentration of odours in a slightly detectable degree
[B] act as a group of comparison with that of the other smells
[C] regulate the participants' moods by decreasing the smell's concentration
[D] protect the participants from losing sense of smell
2. 在李博士的試驗中,礦物油是用來 _____。
[A] 將氣味的濃度控制在可以略微察覺到的程度
[B] 作為和其他氣味進行比較的一個對照組
[C] 通過降低氣味的濃度來調(diào)節(jié)試驗參與者的情緒
[D] 保證試驗參與者不會喪失嗅覺
答案:B 難度系數(shù):☆☆
分析:推理題。文章第三段指出,李博士在試驗中用一種完全沒有氣味的礦物油作為control,這里control的意思是“在對照試驗中被用作對照標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的一個或一組物體”。不過這個意思比較生僻,考生可能不知道。那么可以根據(jù)試驗中它的作用推斷出來,它是絕對無味的,可以和其他氣味的試驗結(jié)果做對照。如果考生擁有足夠的常識,也會知道在一般的科學(xué)試驗中,為了保證試驗結(jié)果的有效性,通常需要設(shè)置一個對照物或?qū)φ战M。那么,選項B最為符合題意。
3. The word “likeability” (Line 4, Paragraph 4) most probably means _____.
[A] similarity
[B] likeness
[C] loveliness
[D] likelihood
3. likeability(第四段第四行)這個詞最有可能的意思是 _____。
[A] 類似性
[B] 相似性
[C] 可愛
[D] 相似性,可能性
答案:C 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:猜詞題。要根據(jù)上下文來判斷該詞的意思,試驗要求參與者給看到的臉做一個判定,判定的內(nèi)容可以根據(jù)試驗結(jié)果看出來,是讓參與者判斷所看到的臉是否“可親”,因此,可以斷定這個詞的意思是C。
4. When the participants consciously smelt the valeric acid, they tended to _____.
[A] make negative judgement to a face
[B] make positive judgement to a face
[C] make biased judgement to a face
[D] make fair judgement to a face
4. 當(dāng)參與者意識到自己聞到了纈草酸的氣味時,他們趨向于 _____。
[A] 對看到的臉給予否定的判斷
[B] 對看到的臉給予肯定的判斷
[C] 對看到的臉給予偏頗的判斷
[D] 對看到的臉給予公平的判斷
答案:D 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:推理題。第五段提到,很讓人費解的是,當(dāng)參與者意識到自己聞到了一種氣味時,那么氣味對臉的判斷的影響就消失了。試驗參與者在沒有意識地聞到這種草酸味時,他會對臉有一種否定的判斷,但是當(dāng)他意識到自己聞到時,這種影響就沒有了。那么可以推斷,他對臉的判斷就比較公正了,因此選項D最為符合。
5. From Dr. Li's experiment, it can be inferred that _____.
[A] one's reaction to subliminal smells reflect useful information about his or her personality
[B] subliminal smells can influence people's interaction with each other
[C] subliminal smells have no effect on people's cons-cious face-perception
[D] subliminal smells turn out to be a means of powerful manipulation in terms of business success
5. 由李博士的試驗可以推斷出 _____。
[A] 一個人對細(xì)微的氣味的反應(yīng)顯示了有關(guān)其個性的有用的信息
[B] 細(xì)微的氣味可以影響人們與他人的交往
[C] 細(xì)微的氣味不會影響人們對臉的有意識的判斷
[D] 細(xì)微的氣味在商業(yè)成功的意義上來說,是一種有力的控制手段
答案:B 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆☆
分析:推理題。李博士的試驗主要是為了看細(xì)微的氣味能否影響人們對他人的看法和印象,根據(jù)試驗結(jié)果,參與者在聞了細(xì)微氣味后會對看到的臉產(chǎn)生一定的反應(yīng),因此,可以得出結(jié)論,細(xì)微的氣味能夠影響人們對他人的行為。選項A,文章中提到有這種可能,但是還沒有證實。C不是該實驗的一個主要結(jié)論,且該論點也沒有得到證實。選項D的相關(guān)內(nèi)容在文章的最后一段有所涉及,但是這只是對前景的推測,還沒有得到證實。因此,答案應(yīng)該是B。
在一個視覺和聲音似乎占絕對上風(fēng)的世界里,我們只需隨便看一下香水行業(yè)的規(guī)模就能明白,氣味也占有很重要的地位。眾所周知,氣味可以左右人的情緒、想法,甚至是約會決定,這也就是為什么人們晚上在城里赴正式的約會前總要噴上點兒香水。但是在所有的這些事例中,那些受影響的人都意識到自己聞到的是什么。隱含在視覺和聲音媒介中的那些微小的訊息已經(jīng)被仔細(xì)研究過了,而淡淡的氣味中潛藏的力量卻被人們忽略了。
李文(音)和她在芝加哥西北大學(xué)的同事們現(xiàn)在就在改變這種狀況。特別需要指出的是,他們現(xiàn)在研究的氣味都極其微弱,以至于人們都說他們聞不到這些氣味。他們想看看這些氣味是不是也可以影響人們對他人的行為。
李博士的試驗結(jié)果剛剛發(fā)表在《心理科學(xué)》上,該試驗邀請了31名志愿者。這些志愿者身處三種低濃度的氣味中,一種是新鮮檸檬中的檸檬醛氣味,第二種是茴香醚中的乙醚氣味,第三種是纈草酸的汗臭味。這三種氣味的濃度都很低。比如,纈草酸的汗臭味濃度為萬億分之七,這種濃度只有警犬才能聞出來。為了便于控制,李博士使用了一種礦物油作為對照,這種礦物油無論濃度多高,它的氣味是察覺不到的。
這些志愿者都被要求嗅裝有某一種氣味或無味礦物油的罐子,然后再按下按鈕表示自己是否聞到了什么。聞完后,他們面前的屏幕上馬上會出現(xiàn)一張臉的圖像,只顯示一秒鐘,然后要求每個人都來判斷這張臉的“可愛程度”。
李博士發(fā)現(xiàn),當(dāng)人們認(rèn)為自己沒有聞到任何氣味時,氣味其實會影響人們對臉的評價。比如,某人聞到纈草酸的氣味時,他對看到的臉就會有不好的反應(yīng)。相反,聞到檸檬酸的氣味時,一般會覺得臉看起來更友好些。(當(dāng)然,每張臉只給同一個人看一次。)但更奇怪的是,當(dāng)參與者意識到自己聞到了某種味道時,上述影響就消失了。
這到底是怎么回事還不清楚。如果氣味帶有有用的個性信息(這是有可能的),那么不管這種化學(xué)物質(zhì)是否可以被潛意識感覺到,其影響應(yīng)當(dāng)是一樣的。如果不帶有這種信息,就很難看出這種潛意識下的反應(yīng)有什么用了。但不管怎樣,事實擺在我們面前。
但是這些發(fā)現(xiàn)的確展示出一些可能的強有力的控制方法。實際上,李博士認(rèn)為這種潛在的用處是巨大的。如果適當(dāng)?shù)貒姙⑿┤藗兟劜坏降南阄叮虅?wù)會議可能會讓人感覺更加愉快。相反,讓人們處在淡淡的臭味中,就可能發(fā)生爭斗。稍微調(diào)節(jié)一下氣味,廣告牌的展示效果可能會更好,而在適當(dāng)時候在電影院內(nèi)噴灑些氣味可能會使觀眾們淚如泉涌。換句話說,勝利的甜蜜氣味是無法覺察的。