雅思閱讀是一場持久戰(zhàn),只有對文字有了足夠的熟悉,才能在卷面上獲得更高的分?jǐn)?shù)。下面是聽力課堂小編整理的雅思閱讀每日一練:The Truth about the Environment的資料,平時多看多練,考試正常發(fā)揮就好。
The Truth about the Environment
For many environmentalists, the world seems to be getting worse. They have developed a hit-list of our main fears: that natural resources are running out; that the population is ever growing, leaving less and less to eat; that species are becoming extinct in vast numbers, and that the planet’s air and water are becoming ever more polluted.
But a quick look at the facts shows a different picture. First, energy and other natural resources have become more abundant, not less so, since the book ‘The Limits to Growth’ was published in 1972 by a group of scientists. Second, more food is now produced per head of the world’s population than at any time in history. Fewer people are starving. Third, although species are indeed becoming extinct, only about 0.7% of them are expected to disappear in the next 50 years, not 25-50%, as has so often been predicted. And finally, most forms of environmental pollution either appear to have been exaggerated, or are transient — associated with the early phases of industrialisation and therefore best cured not by restricting economic growth, but by accelerating it. One form of pollution — the release of greenhouse gases that causes global warming — does appear to be a phenomenon that is going to extend well into our future, but its total impact is unlikely to pose a devastating problem. A bigger problem may well turn out to be an inappropriate response to it.
Yet opinion polls suggest that many people nurture the belief that environmental standards are declining and four factors seem to cause this disjunction between perception and reality.
One is the lopsidedness built into scientific research. Scientific funding goes mainly to areas with many problems. That may be wise policy, but it will also create an impression that many more potential problems exist than is the case.
Secondly, environmental groups need to be noticed by the mass media. They also need to keep the money rolling in. Understandably, perhaps, they sometimes overstate their arguments. In 1997, for example, the World Wide Fund for Nature issued a press release entitled: ‘Two thirds of the world’s forests lost forever.’ The truth turns out to be nearer 20%.
Though these groups are run overwhelmingly by selfless folk, they nevertheless share many of the characteristics of other lobby groups. That would matter less if people applied the same degree of scepticism to environmental lobbying as they do to lobby groups in other fields. A trade organisation arguing for, say, weaker pollution controls is instantly seen as self-interested. Yet a green organisation opposing such a weakening is seen as altruistic, even if an impartial view of the controls in question might suggest they are doing more harm than good.
A third source of confusion is the attitude of the media. People are clearly more curious about bad news than good. Newspapers and broadcasters are there to provide what the public wants. That, however, can lead to significant distortions of perception. An example was America’s encounter with El Nino in 1997 and 1998. This climatic phenomenon was accused of wrecking tourism, causing allergies, melting the ski-slopes and causing 22 deaths. However, according to an article in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, the damage it did was estimated at US4billionbutthebenefitsamountedtosomeUS19 billion. These came from higher winter temperatures (which saved an estimated 850 lives, reduced heating costs and diminished spring floods caused by meltwaters).
The fourth factor is poor individual perception. People worry that the endless rise in the amount of stuff everyone throws away will cause the world to run out of places to dispose of waste. Yet, even if America’s trash output continues to rise as it has done in the past, and even if the American population doubles by 2100, all the rubbish America produces through the entire 21st century will still take up only one-12,000th of the area of the entire United States.
So what of global warming? As we know, carbon dioxide emissions are causing the planet to warm. The best estimates are that the temperatures will rise by 2-3℃ in this century, causing considerable problems, at a total cost of US$5,000 billion.
Despite the intuition that something drastic needs to be done about such a costly problem, economic analyses clearly show it will be far more expensive to cut carbon dioxide emissions radically than to pay the costs of adaptation to the increased temperatures. A model by one of the main authors of the United Nations Climate Change Panel shows how an expected temperature increase of 2.1 degrees in 2100 would only be diminished to an increase of 1.9 degrees. Or to put it another way, the temperature increase that the planet would have experienced in 2094 would be postponed to 2100.
So this does not prevent global warming, but merely buys the world six years. Yet the cost of reducing carbon dioxide emissions, for the United States alone, will be higher than the cost of solving the world’s single, most pressing health problem: providing universal access to clean drinking water and sanitation. Such measures would avoid 2 million deaths every year, and prevent half a billion people from becoming seriously ill.
It is crucial that we look at the facts if we want to make the best possible decisions for the future. It may be costly to be overly optimistic — but more costly still to be too pessimistic.
Questions 27-32
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 3?
In boxes 27-32 on your answer sheet, write
YES if the statement agrees with the writer’s claims
NO if the statement contradicts the writer’s clams
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
27 Environmentalists take a pessimistic view of the world for a number of reasons
28 Data on the Earth’s natural resources has only been collected since 1972.
29 The number of starving people in the world has increased in recent years.
30 Extinct species are being replaced by new species.
31 Some pollution problems have been correctly linked to industrialisation.
32 It would be best to attempt to slow down economic growth.
Questions 33-37
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Write your answers in boxes 33-37 on your answer sheet.
33 What aspect of scientific research does the writer express concern about in paragraph 4?
A the need to produce results
B the lack of financial support
C the selection of areas to research
D the desire to solve every research problem
34 The writer quotes from the Worldwide Fund for Nature to illustrate how
A influential the mass media can be.
B effective environmental groups can be.
C the mass media can help groups raise funds.
D environmental groups can exaggerate their claims.
34 What is the writer’s main point about lobby groups in paragraph 6?
A Some are more active than others.
B Some are better organised than others.
C Some receive more criticism than others.
D Some support more important issues than others.
35 The writer suggests that newspapers print items that are intended to
A educate readers.
B meet their readers’ expectations.
C encourage feedback from readers.
D mislead readers.
36 What does the writer say about America’s waste problem?
A It will increase in line with population growth.
B It is not as important as we have been led to believe.
C It has been reduced through public awareness of the issues.
D It is only significant in certain areas of the country.
Questions 38-40
Complete the summary with the list of words A-I below.
Write the correct letter A-I in boxes 38-40 on your answer sheet.
GLOBAL WARMING
The writer admits that global warming is a 38…………….challenge, but says that it will not have a catastrophic impact on our future, if we deal with it in the 39…………… way. If we try to reduce the levels of greenhouse gases, he believes that it would only have a minimal impact on rising temperatures. He feels it would be better to spend money on the more 40………… health problem of providing the world’s population with clean drinking water.
A unrealistic B agreed C expensive D right
E long-term F usual G surprising H personal
I urgent
Question 27
答案:YES
關(guān)鍵詞:environmentalists
定位原文: 第1段第1、2句 “For many…”
解題思路: hit-list重要事件的列表,按計劃迸行殺害的名單。在這里應(yīng)該理解為一系列。
Question 28
答案: NOT GIVEN
關(guān)鍵詞:1972, only
定位原文: 第2段第2句“...“the Limits to Growth”was published in 1972…”
解題思路: 1972年這個信息只在上面這句話中出現(xiàn),而按照順序解題原則,這道題目的答案只能在第二段中尋找,實際上該段并未提到任何關(guān)于資料搜集開始時間的信息。所以這是一道典型的NOT GIVEN。
Question 29
答案: NO
關(guān)鍵詞: starving people
定位原文: 第2段第3句“Fewer people are starving…”
解題思路: 這句話意思非常明確了,和題目表述矛盾。
Question 30
答案: NOT GIVEN
關(guān)鍵詞: species
定位原文: 第2段第5句話“Third, although species are indeed…”
解題思路: 這一句雖然提到了物種,但是并沒有提到題目中論述的那個話題。而且,題目其實也是在變相地將新舊物種比較,屬于并不存在的比較關(guān)系,因此應(yīng)選擇NOT GIVEN。
Question 31
答案: YES
關(guān)鍵詞: industrialisation
定位原文: 第2段第6句“And finally, most forms…”
解題思路: 這句話說明工業(yè)化早期的確引起了一些污染問題,,故此題選YES。
Question 32
答案: NO
關(guān)鍵詞: economic growth/best
定位原文: 第2段第6句“...and therefore best cured not by restricting…”
解題思路: 文中已經(jīng)明確提到控制污染的最好方式不是減慢經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展速度,而是加速經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展。
Question 33
答案: C
關(guān)鍵詞:paragraph 4
定位原文: 第4段第2句“Scientific funding goes mainly…”
解題思路: 題目問的是作者提出了對哪個科研領(lǐng)域的關(guān)注,定位句明確說明這同樣也給人們造成了一種印象,似乎存在許多潛在的問題,而事實并非如此,言下之意就是要確認(rèn)好對研究領(lǐng)域的選擇,C選項符合。
Question 34
答案: D
關(guān)鍵詞:Worldwide Fund for Nature
定位原文: 第5段第3句“Understandably, perhaps, they sometimes…”
解題思路: 定位句明確說明也許有時候他們夸張了事實,選項D符合。
Question 35
答案: C
關(guān)鍵詞:paragraph 6
定位原文:第6段第2句“That would matter less if…”
解題思路:題目問的是作者對游說團(tuán)體的看法,C選項和原文表述一致。
Question 36
答案: B
關(guān)鍵詞:newspaper print
定位原文: 第7段第3句“Newspaper and broadcasters…”
解題思路: 定位句說報紙和廣播應(yīng)該提供給公眾所需要的,選項B滿足讀者需求,和原文表述一致。
Question 37
答案: B
關(guān)鍵詞:America
定位原文: 第8段第3句“Yet, even if…”
解題思路: 題目問的是作者對美國垃圾問題的觀點是什么,定位句說即便垃圾持續(xù)增長,人口增長,整個21世紀(jì)美國產(chǎn)生的垃圾只占整個美國面積的12萬分之一,言下之意,就是B選項:垃圾問題沒有我們想象的嚴(yán)重。
Question 38
答案: E. long-term
關(guān)鍵詞: global warming/a
定位原文: 文章中最后4段內(nèi)容
解題思路:這里應(yīng)該填一個表示正面惑情色彩的形容詞,而且這個詞要可以和challenge搭配。那么選擇范圍就縮小到了agreed/right/long-term/surprising/urgent五個詞上,,然后再根據(jù)后半句but來判斷,,作者對全球變暖問題的態(tài)度是樂觀的,顯然應(yīng)該是一個與catastrophic相反的詞,因此范圍最終縮小到了long-term。
Question 39
答案: D. right
關(guān)鍵詞:way
定位原文: 文章最后4段內(nèi)容
解題思路: 要和way來搭配,修飾way。按照題目中句子的含義來說,就是說以一個比較好的,合理的處理方法,就不會有災(zāi)難性的影響,只有right是最符合的。
Question 40
答案: I. urgent
關(guān)鍵詞: health problem
定位原文: 倒數(shù)第2段第2句“…most pressing…”
解題思路: 這句話中的most pressing指最急迫的,最迫切的,正好和詞庫中的urgent相對應(yīng),屬于同義表達(dá)。
以上就是雅思閱讀每日一練:The Truth about the Environment的全部資料,如果喜歡,記得收藏哦!
瘋狂英語 英語語法 新概念英語 走遍美國 四級聽力 英語音標(biāo) 英語入門 發(fā)音 美語 四級 新東方 七年級 賴世雄 zero是什么意思南京市曲園小區(qū)英語學(xué)習(xí)交流群