新托福獨(dú)立寫作題目解析及范文:哪種教學(xué)方法對高中生更好

　　2017年11月4日

　　新托福寫作題目回憶：

　　Task 2

　　Independent writing

　　題目

　　High school teachers (teachers of students aged 14-18) spend most of the class time lecturing while the students listen and take notes. Other high school teachers spend most of the class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved in and exchange their ideas. Which of these two approaches do you think is more effective for students’ learning and why?

　　寫作思路

　　本次綜合寫作以及獨(dú)立寫作較為簡單。

　　獨(dú)立寫作具體思路可借鑒：

　　選擇第二種：1. 學(xué)生可以更好的復(fù)習(xí)鞏固知識。2. 學(xué)生可以鍛煉實(shí)用技能。3. 學(xué)生可以更喜歡上課和學(xué)習(xí)。

　　Key sentences:

　　1、First off, students can deepen the understanding of knowledge.

　　2、Additionally, students can put their knowledge into practice.

　　3、Finally, students will find it more interesting to learn.

　　key words & phrases:

　　deepen the understanding of, practical skills, attractive, distraction, feel like doing

　　點(diǎn)評

　　本次考試屬于二選一模式的教育類話題，“高中老師上課講解，學(xué)生邊聽邊記筆記，或者老師要求學(xué)生們就相關(guān)話題進(jìn)行討論，彼此分享想法，這兩種教學(xué)方式哪一種最有利于教學(xué)，為什么?”值得一提的是，這道題原題重復(fù)了2016年11月12日的考題，相信同學(xué)們只要認(rèn)真?zhèn)淇?，?yīng)該會取得不錯的分?jǐn)?shù)。

　　立場：學(xué)生們參與討論，分享彼此想法，是更好的教學(xué)方法。

　　觀點(diǎn)1:學(xué)生們參與討論，有利于促進(jìn)團(tuán)隊(duì)精神，同時學(xué)生之間可以相互學(xué)習(xí)，獲取大量信息。

　　觀點(diǎn)2:學(xué)生們參與討論可以提供新思路、新想法，提高學(xué)習(xí)效率。

　　觀點(diǎn)3:學(xué)生全身心投入項(xiàng)目討論，可以促進(jìn)互動，更有利于提高記憶力。

　　Reason1:First of all, taking part in discussions is conducive to students’ development of team-work spirit ,which enables them to learn from each other and acquire more knowledge in a short time.

　　Reason2:Besides, discussions in class can activate new ideas and inspirations to a particular subject, which will help to reduce individual’s challenges and improve work efficiency.

　　Reason3：It’s better for students to participate in a group about a project wholeheartedly, because it can promote interaction and boost their memory power.

　　新托福寫作范文一：

　　High school teachers (teachers of students ages 14-18) spend most of class time lecturing (speaking) while the students listen and take notes. Other high school teachers spend most of class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved in and exchange their ideas. Which of these two approaches do you think is more effective for student learning and why?

　　Although many prefer classes where teachers lecturing whole the class and students just taking notes, I on the other hand prefer discussion classes where students could be more involved and share their ideas. I will address the most discernible reasons as to why I fell this way in the following.

　　To begin with, “sharing ideas” and “lecturing” need some prerequisite, which means students need some preparation and spend some time to read about the topic before class. This means that they are expected have a basic idea about the class which they will attended, thus they will learn more efficiently. In contrast, when students addend classes absent-mindedly, teachers have to spend most of the class time to explain about the topic. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a university student, my professors lectured all the time. I recall that at the beginning of the class all professors spent a lot of time explaining the basics of the courses and gave students introductions. But some professors of mine used discussion method, and because of that students read about the topic before the class from many different sources such as their textbooks or via internet. The result was amazing because the instructor could engage in the relevant topic immediately and build more upon it.

　　Moreover, when students exchange their ideas in class, they could minimize misunderstandings and could directly address their problems during discussion, which means that the teacher will have more time dedicating to teaching instead of answering their questions. For instance, my high school teacher used this method and many students found the answers to their questions through discussion with their fellow peers.

　　In conclusion, it is for all the aforementioned reasons, I firmly believe that high school teachers should spend their whole time on discussion and encourage students to exchange their ideas because students could attend classes with ideas in mind, and it also helps to prevent misunderstanding and maximize class efficiency.

　　新托福寫作范文二：

　　The main duties of educators include facilitating learning, or the acquisition of knowledge, skills, values and habits. The frequently adopted teaching methods are instructing and organizing discussions and projects. In my opinion, the more effective way of teaching in high school is lecturing.

　　Admittedly, discussions and projects should be an indispensable part of the class.Discussion is one of the best ways for students to brainstorm, share ideas, provoke thinking and develop critical thinking. With teachers’ encouragement and enlightenment, students not only get inspiration from others but also benefit from their own in-depth analysis. Projects, undoubtedly, are also significant, as students try to discover and explore independently, which is the ideal way for teachers to help them find passion on the subject and cultivate research ability.

　　However, in high schools, no matter how important discussions and projects are for students, they should not be the dominant part of class, since teachers’ instruction is more effective at this stage. To begin with, through the traditional way of lecturing, teachers are able to impart more knowledge within the limited time in class. In high school, there are both compulsory courses, designed to help students to grasp basic knowledge for them to survive in society, and selective courses offered to encourage students to cultivate interests and explore potential. For many courses, there is much information, such as history and biology. By lecturing, teachers are able to cover more pages and explain more in details.

　　Secondly, for study of theories and concepts, high school students also need teachers’ instruction. At this age, teenagers with limited study experiences can hardly understand the abstract knowledge on their own. Even with a group to discuss together, they may fail and the discussion turns out to be a waste of time. They have to rely on teachers’ explanation. For example, it is way too challenging for high school students to understand and apply the formulas and functions in math without teachers’ help.

　　To sum up, the dominant method of teaching in high school should be lecturing, while discussions and projects play an auxiliary role.