北極融化可能耗費(fèi)全球60萬億美元

Rapid thawing of the Arctic could trigger a catastrophic "economic timebomb" which would cost trillions of dollars and undermine the global financial system, say a group of economists and polar scientists.

Governments and industry have expected the widespread warming of the Arctic region in the past 20 years to be an economic boon, allowing the exploitation of new gas and oilfields and enabling shipping to travel faster between Europe and Asia. But the release of a single giant "pulse" of methane from thawing Arctic permafrost beneath the East Siberian sea "could come with a $60tn [￡39tn] global price tag", according to the researchers who have for the first time quantified the effects on the global economy.

Even the slow emission of a much smaller proportion of the vast quantities of methane locked up in the Arctic permafrost and offshore waters could trigger catastrophic climate change and "steep" economic losses, they say.

The Arctic sea ice, which largely melts and reforms each year, is declining at an unprecedented rate. In 2012, it collapsed to under 3.5m sqkm by mid September, just 40% of its usual extent in the 1970s. Because the ice is also losing its thickness, some scientists expect the Arctic ocean to be largely free of summer ice by 2020.

The growing fear is that as the ice retreats, the warming of the sea water will allow offshore permafrost to release ever greater quantities of methane. A giant reservoir of the greenhouse gas, in the form of gas hydrates on the East Siberian Arctic Shelf (ESAS), could be emitted, either slowly over 50 years or catastrophically fast over a shorter time frame, say the researchers.

The ramifications of vanishing ice will also be felt far from the poles, they say because the region is pivotal to the functioning of Earth systems, such as oceans and climate. "The imminent disappearance of the summer sea ice in the Arctic will have enormous implications for both the acceleration of climate change, and the release of methane from off-shore waters which are now able to warm up in the summer," said Prof Peter Wadhams, head of the Polar ocean physics group at Cambridge University and one of the authors of the paper published in the journal Nature.

"This massive methane boost will have major implications for global economies and societies. Much of those costs would be borne by developing countries in the form of extreme weather, flooding and impacts on health and agricultural production," he said.

According to the authors, who using the Stern review, calculated that 80% of the extra impacts by value will occur in the poorer economies of Africa, Asia and South America. "Inundation of low-lying areas, extreme heat stress, droughts and storms are all magnified by the extra methane emissions," they authors write. They argue that global economic bodies have not taken into account the risks of rapid ice melt and that the only economic downside to the warming of the Arctic they have identified so far has been the possible risk of oil spills.

But, they say, economists are missing the big picture. "Neither the World Economic Forum nor the International Monetary Fund currently recognise the economic danger of Arctic change. [They must] pay much more attention to this invisible time-bomb. The impacts of just one [giant "pulse" of methane] approaches the $70-tn value of the world economy in 2012", said Prof Gail Whiteman, at the Rotterdam School of Management and another author.

The Nature report comes as global shipping companies prepare to send a record number of vessels across the north of Russia later in 2013, slashing miles travelled between Asia and Europe by over 35% and cutting costs up to 40%.

According to Russian authorities, 218 ships from Korea, China, Japan, Norway, Germany and elsewhere have so far applied for permission to follow the "Northern sea route" (NSR) this year. This route uses the Bering Strait between Siberia and Alaska and is only open for a few months each year with an icebreaker.

But following 2012's record collapse of the Arctic sea ice, shipping companies are gaining confidence to use the route. In 2012, only 46 ships sailed its entire length from the Atlantic to Pacific oceans and in 2011 only four. The route can save even medium-sized bulk carrier 10-15 days and hundreds of tonnes of bunker fuel on a journey between northern Norway and China.

Satellite data collated from the US National snow and ice data centre in Boulder, Colorado this week showed ice loss now accelerating and, at 8.2m sqkm (3.2m square miles) approaching the same extent as during last year's record melt. Over 130,000 sqkm of sea ice melted between July 1 and 15. "Compared to the 1981 to 2010 average, ice extent on July 15 was 1.06m sqkm (409,000 square miles) below average," said a spokesman.

據(jù)《衛(wèi)報(bào)》7月24日?qǐng)?bào)道，一組經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家和極地科學(xué)家表示，北極迅速融化可能引發(fā)災(zāi)難性的“經(jīng)濟(jì)定時(shí)炸彈”。這個(gè)定時(shí)炸彈可能會(huì)耗費(fèi)全球幾百萬億美元，破壞全球金融系統(tǒng)。

政府和工業(yè)界預(yù)估過去二十年范圍不斷擴(kuò)張的北極圈氣候變暖可能促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展，因?yàn)檫@使天然氣和油田得以開發(fā)，加快歐洲與亞洲間海運(yùn)的速度。但是，研究人員首次提出北極融化能造成經(jīng)濟(jì)損失的具體數(shù)額。東西伯利亞海下北極永久凍土融化后，每大規(guī)模釋放一次甲烷氣體，就可能帶來全球60萬億美元(約368萬億元)的損失。

他們表示，北極永久凍土和近岸區(qū)封存的大量甲烷中僅有一小部分緩慢釋放出來也可能觸發(fā)災(zāi)難性的氣候變化和導(dǎo)致嚴(yán)重經(jīng)濟(jì)損失。

北極海冰每年以史無前例的速度大量融化和重組。2012年9月中旬，北極海冰面積縮小至350萬平方公里，僅僅是20世紀(jì)70年代時(shí)總面積的40%。由于海冰自身不斷變薄，一些科學(xué)家估計(jì)2020年，北極海大多數(shù)夏季冰將不復(fù)存在。

越來越讓人恐懼的是，海冰面積縮減，海水變暖將使近岸區(qū)的永久凍土釋放更大量甲烷。研究人員稱，東西伯利亞北極大陸架(ESAS)以天然氣水合物形式儲(chǔ)存的大量溫室氣體也可能因此而釋放，也許需要50年時(shí)間慢慢釋放，又或者災(zāi)難性地在很短時(shí)間內(nèi)全部釋放出來。

北極對(duì)海洋和氣候等地球系統(tǒng)至關(guān)重要。北極發(fā)生變化，冰塊融化，全球多地將受到影響。彼得·瓦德漢姆教授(Prof Peter Wadhams)說：“北極圈夏季海冰迅速消失，將加速氣候變化和促進(jìn)近岸區(qū)甲烷釋放，現(xiàn)在，甲烷氣體使得夏季氣溫越來越高。” 彼得·瓦德漢姆教授是劍橋大學(xué)極地海洋地理工作組的負(fù)責(zé)人，也是《自然》一篇論文的作者之一。

他說：“大量甲烷氣體會(huì)影響全球經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)。發(fā)展中國(guó)家將承受大部分惡果，包括極端氣候和洪災(zāi)，人類健康和農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)也會(huì)受到影響。”

根據(jù)論文作者運(yùn)用斯特恩報(bào)告(Stern review)方法計(jì)算的數(shù)據(jù)，從經(jīng)濟(jì)方面來看，非洲、亞洲和南美洲相對(duì)貧困的經(jīng)濟(jì)體將承擔(dān)80% 的影響。作者寫道：“額外釋放的甲烷將帶來低海拔地區(qū)洪水、極端熱應(yīng)力、干旱和風(fēng)暴問題。”他們認(rèn)為，全球經(jīng)濟(jì)主體尚未考慮冰川快速融化的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，至今僅發(fā)現(xiàn)石油泄漏是北極變暖導(dǎo)致經(jīng)濟(jì)下滑的可能風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。

但是，作者認(rèn)為，經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家遺漏了關(guān)鍵的問題。鹿特丹管理學(xué)院、論文另一作者蓋爾·懷特曼教授(Prof Gail Whiteman)稱：“世界經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇(World Economic Forum)和國(guó)際貨幣基金組織(International Monetary Fund)最近都沒有意識(shí)到北極變化對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的危害。(他們必須)更加關(guān)注這枚可視的定時(shí)炸彈。2012年，(甲烷大量釋放)使世界經(jīng)濟(jì)花費(fèi)70萬億美元(約429萬億元)處理其帶來的各種問題。”

2013年后半年，全球大量海運(yùn)船只準(zhǔn)備穿過俄羅斯北部北冰洋海域，數(shù)量之多，將創(chuàng)下紀(jì)錄，此舉使得亞洲和歐洲之間的航運(yùn)距離縮減超過35%，成本降低40%。

據(jù)俄羅斯當(dāng)局稱，至今，來自韓國(guó)、中國(guó)、日本、挪威、德國(guó)等地共計(jì)218艘船只已經(jīng)遞交今年行駛“北海航線”(NSR)的申請(qǐng)。這條航線會(huì)經(jīng)過介于西伯利亞和阿拉斯加之間的白令海峽(Bering Strait)，破冰船每年會(huì)對(duì)這條航線進(jìn)行破冰，該航線每年僅開放幾個(gè)月。

但是根據(jù)2012年北極冰海面積縮減的記錄，海運(yùn)公司越來越有信心使用這條航線。2011年，僅有4艘船只完成從大西洋到太平洋全程，2012年，有46艘船只完成全程。如果中型散裝貨船行駛這條航線，航行時(shí)間可以縮短10至15天，也可以在挪威和中國(guó)之間節(jié)省幾百噸燃料。

坐落于美國(guó)科羅拉多州博爾德的美國(guó)國(guó)家冰雪數(shù)據(jù)中心(US National snow and ice data centre)本周衛(wèi)星數(shù)據(jù)顯示，融冰不斷加快，2013年初至7月24日，北極冰融化面積達(dá)到820萬平方公里(320萬平方英里)，相當(dāng)于去年全年的冰融化面積。7月1日至15日間，超過13萬平方公里海冰融化。發(fā)言人稱：“7月15日海冰范圍是106萬平方公里(409,000平方英里)，低于 1981年至2010年的平均值。”