In talking with people, don't begin by discussing the things on which you differ. Begin by emphasizing—and keep on emphasizing—the things on which you agree. Keep emphasizing, if possible, that you are both striving for the same end and that your only difference is one of method and not of purpose.
Get the other person saying“Yes, yes”at the outset. Keep your opponent, if possible, from saying“No.”
A“No”response, according to Professor Overstreet,(1) is a most difficult handicap to overcome. When you have said“No,”all your pride of personality demands that you remain consistent with yourself. You may later feel that the“No”was ill-advised; nevertheless, there is your precious pride to consider! Once having said a thing, you feel you must stick to it. Hence it is of the very greatest importance that a person be started in the affirmative direction.
The skillful speaker gets, at the outset, a number of“Yes”responses. This sets the psychological process of the listeners moving in the affirmative direction. It is like the movement of a billiard ball. Propel in one direction, and it takes some force to deflect it; far more force to send it back in the opposite direction.
The psychological patterns here are quite clear. When a person says“No”and really means it, he or she is doing far more than saying a word of two letters. The entire organism—glandular, nervous, muscular—gathers itself together into a condition of rejection. There is, usually in minute but sometimes in observable degree, a physical withdrawal or readiness for withdrawal. The whole neuromuscular system, in short, sets itself on guard against acceptance. When, to the contrary, a person says“Yes,”none of the withdrawal activities takes place. The organism is in a forward— moving, accepting, open attitude. Hence the more“Yeses”we can, at the very outset, induce, the more likely we are to succeed in capturing the attention for our ultimate proposal.
It is a very simple technique—this yes response. And yet, how much it is neglected! It often seems as if people get a sense of their own importance by antagonizing others at the outset.
Get a student to say“No”at the beginning, or a customer, child, husband, or wife, and it takes the wisdom and the patience of angels to transform that bristling negative into an affirmative.
The use of this“yes, yes”technique enabled James Eberson, who was a teller in the Greenwich Savings Bank, in New York City, to secure a prospective customer who might otherwise have been lost.
“This man came in to open an account,”said Mr. Eberson,“and I gave him our usual form to fill out. Some of the questions he answered willingly, but there were others he flatly refused to answer.
“Before I began the study of human relations, I would have told this prospective depositor that if he refused to give the bank this information, we should have to refuse to accept this account. I am ashamed that I have been guilty of doing that very thing in the past. Naturally, an ultimatum like that made me feel good. I had shown who was boss, that the bank's rules and regulations couldn't be flouted. But that sort of attitude certainly didn't give a feeling of welcome and importance to the man who had walked in to give us his patronage.
“I resolved this morning to use a little horse sense. I resolved not to talk about what the bank wanted but about what the customer wanted. And above all else, I was determined to get him saying‘yes, yes’from the very start. So I agreed with him. I told him the information he refused to give was not absolutely necessary.
“‘However,’I said,‘suppose you have money in this bank at your death. Wouldn't you like to have the bank transfer it to your next of kin, who is entitled to it according to law?’
“‘Yes, of course,’he replied.
“‘Don't you think,’I continued,‘that it would be a good idea to give us the name of your next of kin so that, in the event of your death, we could carry out your wishes without error or delay?’
“Again he said,‘Yes.’
“The young man's attitude softened and changed when he realized that we weren't asking for this information for our sake but for his sake. Before leaving the bank, this young man not only gave me complete information about himself but he opened, at my suggestion, a trust account, naming his mother as the beneficiary for his account, and he had gladly answered all the questions concerning his mother also.
“I found that by getting him to say‘yes, yes’from the outset, he forgot the issue at stake and was happy to do all the things I suggested.”
Joseph Allison, a sales representative for Westinghouse Electric Company, had this story to tell:“There was a man in my territory that our company was most eager to sell to. My predecessor had called on him for ten years without selling anything. When I took over the territory, I called steadily for three years without getting an order. Finally, after thirteen years of calls and sales talk, we sold him a few motors. If these proved to be all right, an order for several hundred more would follow. Such was my expectation.
“Right? I knew they would be all right. So when I called three weeks later, I was in high spirits.
“The chief engineer greeted me with this shocking announcement:‘Allison, I can't buy the remainder of the motors from you.’
“‘Why?’I asked in amazement.‘Why?’
“‘Because your motors are too hot. I can't put my hand on them.’
“I knew it wouldn't do any good to argue. I had tried that sort of thing too long. So I thought of getting the‘yes, yes’response.“‘Well, now look, Mr. Smith,’I said.‘I agree with you a hundred percent; if those motors are running too hot, you ought not to buy any more of them. You must have motors that won't run any hotter than standards set by the National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Isn't that so?’
“He agreed it was. I had gotten my first‘yes.’
“‘The Electrical Manufacturers Association regulations say that a properly designed motor may have a temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit above room temperature. Is that correct?’
“‘yes,’he agreed.‘That's quite correct. But your motors are much hotter.’
“I didn't argue with him. I merely asked:‘How hot is the mill room?’
“‘Oh,’he said,‘a(chǎn)bout 75 degrees Fahrenheit.’
“‘Well,’I replied,‘if the mill room is 75 degrees and you add 72 to that, that makes a total of 147 degrees Fahrenheit. Wouldn't you scald your hand if you held it under a spigot of hot water at a temperature of 147 degrees Fahrenheit?’
“Again he had to say‘yes’.
“‘Well,’I suggested,‘wouldn't it be a good idea to keep your hands off those motors?
“‘Well, I guess you're right,’he admitted. We continued to chat for a while. Then he called his secretary and lined up approximately $35,000 worth of business for the ensuing month.
“It took me years and cost me countless thousands of dollars in lost business before I finally learned that it doesn't pay to argue, that it is much more profitable and much more interesting to look at things from the other person's viewpoint and try to get that person saying‘yes, yes.’”
Eddie Snow, who sponsors our courses in Oakland, California, tells how he became a good customer of a shop because the proprietor got him to say“yes, yes.”Eddie had become interested in bow hunting and had spent considerable money in purchasing equipment and supplies from a local bow store. When his brother was visiting him he wanted to rent a bow for him from this store. The sales clerk told him they didn't rent bows, so Eddie phoned another bow store. Eddie described what happened:
“A very pleasant gentleman answered the phone. His response to my question for a rental was completely different from the other place. He said he was sorry but they no longer rented bows because they couldn't afford to do so. He then asked me if I had rented before. I replied,‘Yes, several years ago.’He reminded me that I probably paid $25 to $30 for the rental. I said‘yes’again. He then asked if I was the kind of person who liked to save money. Naturally, I answered‘yes.’He went on to explain that they had bow sets with all the necessary equipment on sale for $34.95. I could buy a complete set for only $4.95 more than I could rent one. He explained that is why they had discontinued renting them. Did I think that was reasonable? My‘yes’response led to a purchase of the set, and when I picked it up I purchased several more items at this shop and have since become a regular customer.”
Socrates,“the gadfly of Athens,”was one of the greatest philosophers the world has ever known. He did something that only a handful of men in all history have been able to do: he sharply changed the whole course of human thought; and now, twenty-four centuries after his death, he is honored as one of the wisest persuaders who ever influenced this wrangling world.
His method? Did he tell people they were wrong? Oh, no, not Socrates. He was far too adroit for that. His whole technique, now called the“Socratic method,”was based upon getting a“yes, yes”response. He asked questions with which his opponent would have to agree. He kept on winning one admission after another until he had an armful of yeses. He kept on asking questions until finally, almost without realizing it, his opponents found themselves embracing a conclusion they would have bitterly denied a few minutes previously.
The next time we are tempted to tell someone he or she is wrong, let's remember old Socrates and ask a gentle question—a question that will get the“yes, yes”response.
The Chinese have a proverb pregnant with the ageold wisdom of the Orient:“He who treads softly goes far.”
They have spent five thousand years studying human nature, those cultured Chinese, and they have garnered a lot of perspicacity:“He who treads softly goes far.”
GET THE OTHER PERSON SAYING“YES, YES”IMMEDIATELY.
————————————————————
(1) Harry A. Overstreet, Influencing Human Behavior New York: Norton. 1925.
和別人對話時,不要一開始就討論存在異議的事。要先從雙方意見一致的事開始討論,別忘了不停地強調(diào)你們的共同點。如果可以的話,要一直強調(diào)你們的最終目標是一樣的,唯一的不同只是達成目標的方式。
讓對方從一開始就對你說“沒錯”而不是“不對”。
哈里·奧沃思特利特教授說:“一個否定的回應是最難逾越的障礙。當你說了‘不’以后,你的自尊心會要求你始終保持一致?;蛟S后來你會發(fā)現(xiàn)不該說‘不’,但是你會顧慮到寶貴的自尊心!說了一句話以后,你就會想要貫徹到底。因此,在肯定中開始是至關重要的。”(1)
游刃有余的交談者從一開始就會得到好幾個“是”的回應,這便把聽者帶入了一系列肯定式的心理過程中。這就像臺球一樣,當你把球推向一個方向時,若想使球旋轉(zhuǎn)則要多發(fā)些力,若想使球往反方向反彈則需要大很多的力氣。
這里的心理規(guī)律很顯著。當對方認真地說“不”時,他說的遠遠不止這一個字。這時,他的腺體、神經(jīng)和肌肉都進入了反對的狀態(tài)。通常會有微小的,但有時也很明顯的身體上的退縮或準備退縮的狀態(tài)。簡而言之,整個肌肉神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)都進入了自我保護機制,拒絕接受任何事情。然而當人們說“是”時,這些退縮活動都不會出現(xiàn),整個機制是積極向前的、接納和開放的狀態(tài)。因此,如果我們一開始得到的肯定回應越多,就越有可能成功推廣我們的提議。
讓人們給予肯定的回應其實只是一個很簡單的技巧,然而人們卻往往忽視了它!人們仿佛總是一開始就用與他人對抗的方式為自己尋找重要感。
如果學生、顧客、孩子、丈夫或妻子從一開始就說了“不”,那么我們便需要天使的智慧與耐心才能把這布滿荊棘的反對意見轉(zhuǎn)化成肯定。
紐約市格林威治儲蓄銀行的出納詹姆斯·艾伯森正是運用了“讓他人說是”這個方法挽回了差點流失的一位客戶。
艾伯森先生說:“一個人來開戶,我遞給他一份常規(guī)的申請表。他欣然回答了幾個問題,對表格上的其他問題卻拒絕回答。
“在學習這堂人際關系課之前,我會這樣告訴他,如果他拒絕向銀行提供信息,我們一定會拒絕他的申請。我對自己以往的行為感到愧疚,能夠給人下最終審判自然是有快感的事。我強調(diào)了我們的制度,而且銀行也不能亂了規(guī)矩。但是那樣的態(tài)度肯定不會讓來存錢的客戶覺得受歡迎、受重視。
“今天早晨我決定運用常識,一開始先不說銀行的需要,而是要詢問客戶的需求。最重要的是,我希望從一開始就把他帶入說‘是’的狀態(tài)。所以我同意了他的做法,告訴他他拒絕提供的信息并不是必需的。”
“我又對他說:‘但是假設您去世時賬戶里還有錢,難道您不希望銀行能依法幫您把它轉(zhuǎn)到您所授權的最親近的人那里嗎?’
“‘當然希望啦?!卮?。
“我又繼續(xù)問道:‘那么,難道您不愿意提供這個人的姓名,好讓我們在意外情況發(fā)生時能順利把錢轉(zhuǎn)給此人嗎?’
“他再次回答了:‘當然愿意呀?!?/p>
“這位年輕人的態(tài)度逐漸平和下來了,當他意識到銀行要求填寫的信息并非是出于銀行的利益時,他的觀點發(fā)生了變化。這位年輕人離開銀行時,不但給了我他的全部信息,還在我的建議下開了一個信托賬號,指定他的母親為受益人,也填寫了有關他母親的一切資料。
“我發(fā)現(xiàn)如果一開始就引領他進入肯定的思維模式中,這樣他便會忘了之前為何要堅持以及在堅持什么,并愉快地做了一切我建議他做的事?!?/p>
西屋電氣公司的一名銷售代表約瑟夫·埃里森給我們講了這樣一個故事:“公司很希望當?shù)氐囊粋€商人能成為他們的顧客,但我的前輩們已經(jīng)向他電話推銷了十年,也未能賣出去任何東西。我接管這個領域后也定期打電話向他推銷,在長達三年的時間里,也毫無結(jié)果。在這十三年的電話交談和商品推銷后,我們終于成功地賣了幾個發(fā)動機給他。如果這些發(fā)動機能夠正常運行的話,他將會訂購幾百臺發(fā)動機,這是我的理解。
“我知道這幾個發(fā)動機不會有問題,所以當我三周后向他致電時,我是興高采烈的。
“總工程師平靜地向我們宣布了一個令人震驚的消息:‘埃里森,我們不能買更多的發(fā)動機?!?/p>
“‘為什么?’我震驚地問,‘究竟為什么?’
“‘因為你們的發(fā)動機散熱不好,我都無法把手放在發(fā)動機上?!?/p>
“我知道爭執(zhí)無濟于事,我之前曾經(jīng)有過太多慘痛的教訓,所以我想起了‘讓對方說是’的方式。
“‘史密斯先生,你看,’我說,‘我完全同意。如果那些發(fā)動機過熱你的確不該買。你肯定見過比國家電器制造商協(xié)會標準熱度要低的發(fā)動機,對不對?’
“他說是的。這是我得到的第一個‘是’。
“‘國家電器制造商協(xié)會要求設計合理的發(fā)動機熱度只可比室內(nèi)溫度高72華氏度。是不是?’
“‘沒錯?!卮?,‘非常正確。但是你們的發(fā)動機超過了那個溫度。’
“我沒有和他爭執(zhí),只是問他:‘工廠里面的溫度是多少?’
“‘哦,’他說,‘大概75華氏度?!?/p>
“我回應道:‘那么如果室內(nèi)75華氏度,再加72度,那就是147度。如果你把手放在147度的流水下會燙傷的吧?’
“他再次給出肯定的答復。
“于是我說:‘這樣的話是不是本來也不該用手去碰發(fā)動機呢?’
“‘嗯,我猜你是對的。’他承認道。我們又聊了一會兒,后來他就讓秘書訂了價值三萬五千美金的發(fā)動機,這相當于接下來一整個月的營業(yè)額。
“浪費了多年時間,損失了上萬美金后,我才懂得了爭執(zhí)無用的道理。用他人的立場思考問題并能讓對方說‘是的’‘是的’才是最有利也是最有趣的方式?!?/p>
贊助了我們加州奧克蘭培訓班的艾迪·斯諾給我們講述了他是如何因為店主懂得讓他說“是”而成了店里的一名忠誠顧客的。艾迪喜歡用弓箭打獵,并花了很多錢在當?shù)匾婚g店鋪里購置設備。當他的哥哥來看他時,他想從這家店里租一把弓,但銷售人員說他們不外租,所以艾迪給另一家店打電話講述了事情的經(jīng)過:
“一位非常和藹可親的人接了電話,他給我的回答和另一家店完全不同。他說他很抱歉,他們停止了租弓箭的業(yè)務,因為他們負擔不起了。之后他問我以前是否租過,我說:‘是的,幾年前租過?!聹y我那時應該付了25—30美金租金,我再次說‘沒錯’。后來他問我,我是否是喜歡省錢的人,我自然給予了肯定的回答。對方繼續(xù)說道他們有一套弓箭正在促銷,包含了所有必需的設備,一共34.95美金,僅需比租器材多花4.95美金就能買下這一套器材。他最后解釋道,這就是他們停止出租器材的原因。我認為他的話合理嗎?我的肯定回答使我買下了那一套器材。我去取貨時還順便在那家店里買了其他幾樣東西,后來慢慢地成了他們的????!?/p>
自喻為“希臘的牛虻”的蘇格拉底是世上最偉大的哲學家之一。他做了有史以來只有少數(shù)人做到的事:他大大地改變了別人的思維方式。在他辭世兩千四百年后的今天,他被奉為影響辯證體系的最具智慧的辯者。
他到底用了怎樣的方式呢?他告訴別人“你是錯的”了嗎?哦,不,蘇格拉底不會做如此不精明的事。他的辯證方法被稱作“蘇格拉底法”,而這方法就是基于讓對方說“是”。他向?qū)Ψ教岢鲆幌盗惺箤Ψ讲坏貌徽f“是”的問題。他在一個又一個的問題上得到肯定的答復,最后得到一籮筐的“是”。他會繼續(xù)提問下去,直到最后對手在不經(jīng)意間發(fā)現(xiàn)自己居然擁護著幾分鐘前還尖銳反駁的結(jié)論。
今后當我們想告訴對方“你是錯的”時,讓我們記住蘇格拉底的做法,提一些溫和的問題,能得到對方肯定答復的問題。
中國有句諺語,蘊含著東方的古老智慧:“輕履者行遠。”
中國人用了五千年的時間揣摩人性、學習智者的思想,終于獲得了敏銳的洞察力:“輕履者行遠。”
立刻獲取對方的贊同。
————————————————————
(1) 哈里·A.奧沃思特利特,《人類行為》(紐約:諾頓出版社,1925)。