演講MP3+雙語文稿:下一場全球農(nóng)業(yè)革命

00:00

00:00

MP3下載

https://online2.tingclass.net/lesson/shi0529/10000/10387/tedyp100.mp3

https://image.tingclass.net/statics/js/2012

聽力課堂TED音頻欄目主要包括TED演講的音頻MP3及中英雙語文稿，供各位英語愛好者學習使用。本文主要內(nèi)容為演講MP3+雙語文稿:下一場全球農(nóng)業(yè)革命，希望你會喜歡！

【演講者及介紹】Bruce Friedrich

布魯斯·弗里德里希（Bruce Friedrich）計劃以自己的方式與肉類行業(yè)競爭——創(chuàng)造出與傳統(tǒng)肉類口味相同或更好、價格更低的替代品

【演講主題】下一場全球農(nóng)業(yè)革命

【中英文字幕】

翻譯者 x my 校對者 Ziyao Wang

00:14

In 2019, humanity received a warning: 30 ofthe world's leading scientists released the results of a massive three-yearstudy into global agriculture and declared that meat production is destroyingour planet and jeopardizing global health. One of the study's authors explainedthat "humanity now poses a threat to the stability of the planet ... [Thisrequires] nothing less than a new global agricultural ."

2019年，人類了收到一個警告，30位世界頂尖的科學家發(fā)布了一項對全球農(nóng)業(yè)長達三年的 研究結(jié)果，宣稱肉類的生產(chǎn)正在摧毀我們的家園，并危害全球安全。該研究的一位作者解釋說：“人類正在危害地球的穩(wěn)定... （為解決問題）我們需要一場新的世界農(nóng)業(yè)革命。“

00:41

As somebody who's spent the last twodecades advocating a shift away from industrial meat production, I wanted tobelieve that this clarion call was going to make a difference. The thing is,I've seen this sort of thing again and again and again for decades.

作為一個把過去二十年的時間都花在倡議工業(yè)肉類生產(chǎn)轉(zhuǎn)型的人，我曾經(jīng)相信這個號召會帶來些許改變。然而，幾十年來此類事件還是反復發(fā)生。

01:07

The main point of these studies tends to beclimate change. But antibiotic resistance represents just as big of a threat.We are feeding massive doses of antibiotics to farm animals. These antibioticsare then mutating into superbugs that threaten to render antibiotics obsoletewithin all of our lifetimes. You want a scare? Google: "the end of workingantibiotics."

這些研究的重點都是氣候變化。但抗生素耐藥性也是一個很大的威脅。我們給農(nóng)場動物喂食大量的抗生素。這些抗生素隨后轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)槌壖毦?，使得我們有生之年研究出的抗生素都不再有效。想知道后果嗎？可以去百度一?“有效抗生素的終結(jié)”。

01:33

I'm going to get one thing out of the way:I am not here to tell anybody what to eat. Individual action is great, butantibiotic resistance and climate change -- they require more. Besides,convincing the world to eat less meat hasn't worked. For 50 years,environmentalists, global health experts and animal activists have been beggingthe public to eat less meat. And yet, per capita meat consumption is as high asit's been in recorded history. The average North American last year ate morethan 200 pounds of meat. And I didn't eat any.

我想說明的是：我不是來教大家該吃什么的。個體行為固然很好，但是要解決抗生素耐藥性和氣候變化問題——這還遠遠不夠。并且，勸大家少吃肉是沒有效果的。50多年來，環(huán)境學家，國際衛(wèi)生專家以及動物保護者一直苦口婆心地勸告大家少吃肉。然而，人均肉類消耗量自有歷史記載以來一直都居高不下。去年北美人均消耗肉類 200多磅（約90.7kg）。我可一點肉都沒吃。

02:11

Which means somebody out there ate 400pounds of meat.

這意味著有人吃了400磅。

02:14

（Laughter）

（笑聲）

02:16

On our current trajectory, we're going toneed to be producing 70 to 100 percent more meat by 2050. This requires aglobal solution. What we need to do is we need to produce the meat that peoplelove, but we need to produce it in a whole new way. I've got a couple of ideas.

以目前的趨勢來看，到2050年，我們生產(chǎn)的肉類要比現(xiàn)在多70％-100％。這個問題需要全人類一起解決。我們需要做的是，生產(chǎn)人們喜愛的肉類，不過我們要以一種全新的方式生產(chǎn)。我有幾個主意。

02:35

Idea number one: let's grow meat fromplants. Instead of growing plants, feeding them to animals, and all of thatinefficiency, let's grow those plants, let's biomimic meat with them, let'smake plant-based meat. Idea number two: for actual animal meat, let's grow itdirectly from cells. Instead of growing live animals, let's grow the cellsdirectly. It takes six weeks to grow a chicken to slaughter weight. Grow thecells directly, you can get that same growth in six days. This is what thatlooks like at scale. It's your friendly neighborhood meat brewery.

其一：從植物中生產(chǎn)肉。不再把植物當作動物飼料，那樣效率太低了。我們可以種植物，然后仿生肉類，做出素肉。其二：如果想做真的肉，我們可以用細胞培育。而不是養(yǎng)殖牲畜，我們直接培育細胞。將雞養(yǎng)到可以屠宰的重量需要六周。直接培育細胞的話，要達到同樣大小，只需六天。這就是規(guī)?；纳a(chǎn)過程。就像是你家附近美妙的肉類“啤酒廠”。

03:10

（Laughter）

（笑聲）

03:13

I want to make two points about this. Thefirst one is, we believe we can do it. In recent years, some companies havebeen producing meat from plants that consumers cannot distinguish from actualanimal meat, and there are now dozens of companies growing actual animal meatdirectly from cells. This plant-based and cell-based meat gives consumerseverything that they love about meat -- the taste, the texture and so on -- butwith no need for antibiotics and with a fraction of the adverse impact on theclimate. And because these two technologies are so much more efficient, atproduction scale these products will be cheaper.

我想說的有兩點。一是：我們相信我們能夠做到。近年來，有些公司已經(jīng)在生產(chǎn)素肉了，消費者分別不出素肉和真肉口感的區(qū)別。并且，有一批工廠已經(jīng)直接從細胞中生產(chǎn)肉類。素肉和細胞肉能還提供消費者喜愛的關(guān)于肉的一切——味道，質(zhì)地，等等。但不需要抗生素，對地球氣候也只有很小的影響。由于這兩項技術(shù)生產(chǎn)肉類效率如此高，如果大規(guī)模生產(chǎn)，肉類產(chǎn)品會更便宜。

03:51

But one quick point about that -- it's notgoing to be easy. These plant-based companies have spent small fortunes ontheir burgers, and cell-based meat has not yet been commercialized at all. So we'regoing to need all hands on deck to make these the global meat industry.

但是要知道，這項技術(shù)不那么簡單。生產(chǎn)素肉的公司已經(jīng)在產(chǎn)品上投入大筆資金，細胞肉也沒有完全進入市場。所以我們需要所有人共同努力，來建造全球范圍的產(chǎn)業(yè)。

04:08

For starters, we need the present meatindustry. We don't want to disrupt the meat industry, we want to transform it.We need their economies of scale, their global supply chain, their marketingexpertise and their massive consumer base.

首先，我們?nèi)孕枰F(xiàn)存的肉類產(chǎn)業(yè)。我們不想干擾肉類產(chǎn)業(yè)，我們想要它轉(zhuǎn)型。我們需要他們的經(jīng)濟規(guī)模，他們的全球供應鏈，營銷技術(shù)，以及廣大消費者的基礎(chǔ)。

04:23

We also need governments. Governments spendtens of billions of dollars every single year on research and developmentfocused on global health and the environment. They should be putting some ofthat money into optimizing and perfecting the production of plant-based andcell-based meat.

我們還需要各國政府的支持。各國政府每年在全球健康和環(huán)境方面的研究和開發(fā)上花費了數(shù)百億美元。他們應該把部分資金用來優(yōu)化和完善素肉和細胞肉的生產(chǎn)。

04:42

Look, tens of thousands of people died fromantibiotic-resistant superbugs in North America just last year. By 2050, thatnumber is going to be 10 million per year globally. And climate changerepresents an existential threat to huge portions of our global family,including some of the poorest people on the face of the planet.

在北美，僅僅去年一年，就有數(shù)以萬計的人們死于有抗生素耐藥性的超級病菌。到2050年，該數(shù)字會達到每年全球數(shù)千萬。還有，氣候變化對全球很多家庭構(gòu)成了毀滅性的威脅，這里面包括一部分全球最貧困人口。

05:08

Climate change, antibiotic resistance --these are global emergencies. Meat production is exacerbating these emergencieson a global scale. But we are not going to decrease meat consumption unless wegive consumers alternatives that cost the same or less and that taste the sameor better.

氣候變化、抗生素耐藥性都是全球性緊急事件。肉類生產(chǎn)惡化了它們的緊急程度。但我們不會減少肉類消耗，除非我們能提供給消費者一些同樣價錢或更加便宜，口味相同或更好的替代品。

05:28

We have the solution. Let's make meat fromplants. Let's grow it directly from cells. It's past time that we mobilize theresources that are necessary to create the next global agricultural .

我們有解決方案。讓我們用植物生產(chǎn)肉，或直接用細胞培育。我們已經(jīng)動用了所需的資源，是時候進行下一場全球農(nóng)業(yè)革命了。

05:43

Thank you.

謝謝。

05:44

（Applause）

（掌聲）