金融時(shí)報(bào):谷歌無人駕駛汽車發(fā)生交通事故

所屬教程:金融時(shí)報(bào)原文閱讀

瀏覽:

2021年10月08日

手機(jī)版

掃描二維碼方便學(xué)習(xí)和分享

谷歌無人駕駛汽車發(fā)生交通事故

在2月情人節(jié)那天，谷歌的一輛無人駕駛汽車撞上了一輛公交車，這是谷歌無人駕駛汽車首次系統(tǒng)判斷錯(cuò)誤而導(dǎo)致的事故。對(duì)于一直強(qiáng)調(diào)無人駕駛汽車的谷歌來說，這是個(gè)壞消息。

測(cè)試中可能遇到的詞匯和知識(shí)：

etiquette規(guī)矩['et?ket; et?'ket]

scrape擦痕[skre?p]

encounter遭遇[?n'ka?nt?; en-]

unflattering不好看的[?n'fl?t(?)r??]

sort將…分類[s??t]

abide忍受[?'ba?d]

negotiation談判；順利的通過[n?g????'e??(?)n]

minor collision輕微的碰撞

simulation模擬[,s?mj?'le???n]

Google driverless car in road accident （491words）

By Richard Waters in San Francisco

One of Google's driverless cars has been involved in an accident for the first time in a situation where human drivers rely on the normal social etiquette of the road to avoid scrapes, according to an accident report filed in California.

The incident highlights the challenges of programming machines to deal with the sort of social situations that humans encounter every day on the roads, but which are beyond robots to resolve, experts said.

It also threatens to cast an unflattering light on the technology at a time when Google is fighting a proposed California rule requiring autonomous vehicles to have human drivers on hand to override their controls in emergencies.

However, the company suggested that the accident would have occurred even if a human had been at the wheel, while adding that it had already adjusted its algorithms to take account of the lessons from the scrape.

“There are all sorts of social clues that people abide by that are hard to program into a car,” said Jerry Kaplan, a serial technology entrepreneur and author of a recent book on robotics. “There was nothing terrible about this, no one got hurt or killed. But it will be a long time before the cars can be driven in heavily used streets and abide by the same social conventions people use.”

In a filing with the California Department of Motor Vehicles, Google said its car had been trying to pull out into slow-moving traffic on Valentine's Day when a bus driver did not slow to leave room, causing a minor collision.

In a blog post on Monday, it blamed the accident on a “tricky set of circumstances” caused partly by an adjustment it had made to the car's algorithms weeks earlier to help it drive more like a human.

“This is a classic example of the negotiation that's a normal part of driving — we're all trying to predict each other's movements,” the company said. “We clearly bear some responsibility.” However, it also said that a Google employee in the car had also

The car had pulled close to the side of the road to make a turn, leaving room for other vehicles that were carrying on straight ahead to pass in the same lane — a manoeuvre Google said it had programmed into the car to make it a more considerate driver.

After finding its path was blocked by sandbags that had been placed round a drain, the car was forced to move back out into the line of traffic, causing the accident.

Google said it had already programmed lessons from the accident into its software, along with its findings from running simulations of thousands of similar situations.

“From now on, our cars will more deeply understand that buses (and other large vehicles) are less likely to yield to us than other types of vehicles, and we hope to handle situations like this more gracefully in the future,” it said.

請(qǐng)根據(jù)你所讀到的文章內(nèi)容，完成以下自測(cè)題目：

1.Where did the accident happen?

A.Utah

B.Montana

C.Scotland

D.California

答案(1)

2.How many people got hurt or killed in this accident?

A.1

B.2

C.0

D.3